Presented by Premier Health Partners

Adopt-a-Painting

We would like you to consider adopting a girl or boy, painting that is, in our Adopt-a-Painting program during the upcoming exhibition - CHILDREN IN AMERICAN ART from the Museum of Fine Arts, Boston.

The exhibition, which opens to the public on September 20 and runs through January 4, 2009, will feature children - girls and boys, young and old, cute and not so cute. The paintings in the CHILDREN IN AMERICAN ART exhibition span American history from the eighteenth and nineteenth centuries and reflect the changing viewpoint of children in our society.

The paintings have been grouped in $5,000 and $2,500 levels and are being adopted on a first come, first served basis. When you Adopt-a-Painting, there will be an accompanying label displayed with the painting, which will include your name and any other designation you would like to make. For instance, "In honor of my grandchildren, Kate and William Smith." Also, The Dayton Art Institute will host a pre-exhibition gathering on Monday, September 15, from 6:00 to 8:00 p.m. to honor our adoptive parents and their families and give them the very first look at the exhibition.

We are excited about the CHILDREN IN AMERICAN ART exhibition; it is quite extraordinary. The support we receive from the Adopt-a-Painting program is meaningful to the museum and enables us to offer the community a very special art experience.

There are still many lovely paintings waiting to be adopted! For more information or to see a complete list of the paintings in the exhibition please call Dona Vella, Director for Development, 937-223-5277, ext. 243.


Partial list of paintings for adoption

$5,000 level

John Singleton Copley (1738–1815)
MARY AND ELIZABETH ROYALL, about 1758
Oil on canvas
Museum of Fine Arts, Boston, Julia Knight Fox Fund

 

The son of a Boston tobacconist, Copley trained himself in the art of painting and by his mid-20s had become Boston’s most sought-after portraitist. Copley seldom painted children. His portrait of Mary and Elizabeth Royall is even rarer for showing the two teenaged daughters of Isaac Royall of Medford (near Boston), Massachusetts, one of the wealthiest merchants in New England. In this portrait, designed to show off the Royalls’ wealth and social status, the girls are dressed in expensive silk gowns trimmed with imported lace.

     

Mary Stevenson Cassatt (1844–1926)
ELLEN MARY IN A WHITE COAT, about 1896
Oil on canvas
Museum of Fine Arts, Boston, anonymous Fractional Gift in honor of Ellen Mary Cassatt

 

Mary Cassatt's 2 year old niece,

Ellen Mary in a White Coat is a tour de force of compositional invention and psychological insight. The child is encased in a luxurious, bulky hat and coat that become the key structural elements of the composition. The curved line formed by their fur trim contrasts with the rectangles of the yellow chair and background panels. Despite the fact that only her tiny face, hands, and summarily sketched feet are visible, Cassatt has managed to indicate the child’s personality and mood.

     

William Matthew Prior (1806–1873)
WILLIAM ALLEN, 1843
Oil on canvas
Museum of Fine Arts, Boston, bequest of Martha C. Karolik for the M. and M. Karolik Collection of American Paintings, 1815–1865

 

William Allen is an example of Prior’s more complex style, and the Allen family likely paid the artist a sizeable fee for this charming portrait of their two-year-old son. The greyhound dogs—one of which sports a gilt-buckled collar—were family pets and appeared on the family crest. The flowers, symbolic of innocence and sweetness, and the straw hat, stylish summer headwear for little boys, add colorful notes to the portrayal.

     

$2,500 Level

Ralph Earl (1751-1801)
THE STRYKER SISTERS, 1787
Oil on canvas
Lent by the Butler Institute of American Art
 

The Stryker Sisters is one of about 20 known works Ralph Earl painted while he was confined in New York City’s debtor’s prison. Delicately posed like a dance team, Ann and Winifred Stryker—ages 6 and 5—show a touching closeness. Earl exhibited painterly virtuosity in the pink slips that show through the gauzy white embroidered exterior of the sisters’ dresses.

     

John F. Francis (1808–1886)
THREE CHILDREN, 1840
Oil on canvas
Museum of Fine Arts, Boston, gift of Maxim Karolik for the M. and M. Karolik Collection of American Paintings, 1815–1865

 

Francis was influenced by the Romantic painter Thomas Sully, of Philadelphia. He gave his sitters the same bright eyes and rosy complexions that made Sully’s portraits so popular, while portraying his subjects as less pretty and more down-to-earth.

     

 

Here the father strums away at a rhythm that encourages the unity of dance and play among the three children and provides a context for the joyous occasion. While the children form a circle among themselves, their steps and cadence are conditioned by the clapping hands of the mother.

     

James Abbott McNeill Whistler (1834–1903)
LITTLE ROSE OF LYME REGIS, 1895
Oil on canvas
Museum of Fine Arts, Boston, Warren Collection—William Wilkins Warren Fund

 

Painted on a visit to the British coastal resort town of Lyme Regis in 1895, the portrait of eight-year-old Rosie Rendall, daughter of the town’s mayor, was not a commission but one of a small group of studies Whistler undertook as tributes to the children he called “the little Lyme Regis maidens.” Whistler portrayed Rosie gazing directly at the viewer, nervously clasping her hands. She wears a red pinafore over a black dress and emerges from a dark background.

     

 

In this serene and elegant portrait, mother and daughter are fashionably attired. Mrs. Buckham wears a fancy cap adorned with blue silk flowers and lace. Georgianna, about five years old, stands in front of her mother in a brightly colored plaid dress. Mrs. Buckham places her arm around her daughter’s shoulders in a gesture that is both affectionate and protective.

     

  Brown became known for his depiction of bootblacks, the street urchins who made a few pennies by polishing shoes. As in Tuckered Out—The Shoeshine Boy, he showed them in tattered clothing but clean, well-fed, and healthy. Brown’s paintings allowed his patrons (mostly successful businessmen) to disregard the wretched conditions in which these children lived.
     

 

< Back